Welcome Guest, please login or register.

AudioBook Bay Forum » Discussion » Books » [WiP] Best of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Hugo and Nebula Awardees 1953-present

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [WiP] Best of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Hugo and Nebula Awardees 1953-present  (Read 3166 times)
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« on: August 07, 2017, 02:35:54 PM »


 --- under construction; to be moved to the "torrent linklists" archive upon completion ---

Key

  • Hugo
  • Nebula

  • Hugo and Nebula, successive years
  • Hugo and Nebula, same year

  • NB: Both are on rare occasions split between multiple nominees, or not awarded at all.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2017, 03:48:42 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2017, 03:15:45 PM »


Novels



(continued below)
« Last Edit: August 23, 2017, 11:40:21 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2017, 05:31:43 PM »


(continued from above)

« Last Edit: August 23, 2017, 11:26:35 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2017, 05:14:25 AM »

*placeholder*
« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 11:15:55 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2017, 09:00:56 AM »


When/if completed, this should be a list of working (!) audiobook torrents for all all Hugo and Nebula award-winning novels for which there exist audio versions, listed e.g. here and there.

Working notes, in case others want to contribute, which I'm hoping for:
- Pick a year, locate the (usually) two novels in the lists linked above, look for corresponding shares (which may mean a series or author pack).
- If such torrents exist, test health.
- If no such torrents exist or none remain healthy, upload one, or ask for one to be uploaded via the requests board.
- Then post list entry in this thread, including year, titles (with links to 'pedia pages or some such), authors (ditto), torrent links, for it to be added to the OP.
- If multiple healthy torrents exist, select which one(s) to include, based on quality (specs, comments, and so forth). If they differ in matters like file format or even correspond to different productions, by all means include the lot, though.
- As you can see, I've tentatively started the list in reverse chronological order, because on reflection I imagine there are more people who are more interested in the latest entries than in the earliest ones than vice versa, so this makes it more user-friendly overall... yes?
- Adding mere nominees as well as actual winners would make this listing too unwieldy, IMO. Do others feel differently?

Early feedback appreciated! Smiley
« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 11:15:39 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
Gweilo
Global Moderator
Legendary Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7008



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2017, 01:04:22 PM »

Since this is just novels, not shorts, novellas, and other categories, should say so in the title.
Also could be a bit shorter, say:

Best SF and Fantasy Novels: Hugo and Nebula winners 1953-present

What is [WiP]?
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2017, 01:17:34 PM »


I wanted to put "Best of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Hugo and Nebula Award-Winning Novels 1953-present", but ran out of character quota.

On reflection, though, there's no reason to exclude the other awards a priori. Instead, I'm going to put "novels" as the title of the first post, and if at some point I or someone else decides to add further categories, those can go into the second (et cetera) posts as separate lists.

"WiP" was the shortest way I could come up with to put something equating to "under construction" into the title - "work in progress". I'm not sure I'd have recognized it immediately either, but it does have enough sufficient currency to have made it into a handful of dictionaries.
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2017, 04:37:00 AM »

There's a number of cases in which the awards were won jointly but "offset" by a year, as in: "Paladin of Souls" by Lois McMaster Bujold, Hugo Award 2004, Nebula Award 2005. What's the best way to present that? Like so, maybe?

  • 2005
    • H "Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell" by Susanna Clarke
  • 2004-2005
    • HN "Paladin of Souls" by Lois McMaster Bujold
  • 2004
    • N "The Speed of Dark" by Elizabeth Moon

I find it a bit confusing, but all the information is there (at least implicitly) and I really don't want to list the book twice or use a qv along the lines of "see last year's Hugo award" or whatever. Then again, some of those cases occur in successive years, which makes it yet a bit more confusing. So... I dunno.

[ETA] I could also use tables instead of lists. It doesn't look like this bbCode supports merged cells, but even without, they do a passable job. Definitely more fiddly, though.


2006H
N
"Spin" by Robert C Wilson
"Camouflage" by Joe Haldeman
2005
H"Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell" by Susanna Clarke
2005
2004
N
H
"Paladin of Souls" by Lois McMaster Bujold
2004
N"The Speed of Dark" by Elizabeth Moon
2003H
N
"Hominids" by Robert J Sawyer
"American Gods" by Neil Gaiman
« Last Edit: August 09, 2017, 08:02:05 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
Gweilo
Global Moderator
Legendary Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7008



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2017, 10:39:39 AM »

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_joint_winners_of_the_Hugo_and_Nebula_awards for how they handle it.
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2017, 11:51:04 AM »


Thanks, good find. That does help a bit. Smiley
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2017, 12:06:49 PM »

It occurred to me that colour-coding provides quite an elegant solution to that offset-year wrinkle, because that approach bypasses the list hierarchy altogether. Using for instance Hugo award, Nebula award, both awards:

  • 2008 "The Yiddish Policemen's Union" by Michael Chabon
  • [...]
  • 2005 "Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell" by Susanna Clarke
  • 2004-2005 "Paladin of Souls" by Lois McMaster Bujold
  • 2004 "The Speed of Dark" by Elizabeth Moon
« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 08:13:44 AM by kassyopeia » Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2017, 10:00:46 AM »


Yesterday, N K Jemisin won a Hugo for her novel "The Obelisk Gate", sequel to "The Fifth Season" for which she won the same award last year. I see only one precedent for such a back-to-back win for two novels in a series, namely Card's "Ender's Game" and "Speaker of the Dead" in the '80s. Quite an accomplishment! Smiley
Logged
Gweilo
Global Moderator
Legendary Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7008



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2017, 11:20:57 AM »

Yesterday, N K Jemisin won a Hugo for her novel "The Obelisk Gate", sequel to "The Fifth Season"

I checked  "The Fifth Season" and the torrent is actually m4a, so I corrected that.
I hope these won on the merits, not out of some attempt to correct the "SF is so white" image. Not that I'm a Sad Puppy.  I was a fan of Samuel Delany for a decade before I saw a photo of him and realised he was black....  It's the books that matter, not who or what the author is.
Will put it on my reading list anyway.
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2017, 11:30:37 AM »


I checked  "The Fifth Season" and the torrent is actually m4a, so I corrected that.

Thanks! I take the snippets I use for the share link from the top of the torrent description, so if it's wrong there, it's going to be wrong here too. I'll try to get into the habit of checking the stated filetype against the contents listing from now on. Smiley
Logged
Gweilo
Global Moderator
Legendary Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7008



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2017, 12:49:59 PM »

I'll try to get into the habit of checking the stated filetype against the contents listing from now on. Smiley
"mp3" alone usually means "I don't know or care".
Most just leave it as default, very few bother to give the bitrate.

Also, there was another back-to-back: in 1991 & 92 Lois McMaster Bujold won Hugos for The Vor Game and Barrayar respectively, both in her Vorkosigan  series.  Read one of them once; barely SF at all. A "cosy space opera" maybe. Which I can enjoy, but forgettable.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2017, 01:44:40 PM by Gweilo » Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2017, 12:56:41 PM »


So there was! I assumed the two titles had to be unconnected because they're listed with different publishers in the listicle, but that assumption was clearly too naive in this case. Smiley

Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 13, 2017, 02:59:20 AM »


Quote
As a title, yes you'd lower case "in" but as an acronym you should cap all.

Matter of taste more than anything else, no? Stands to reason that I must've seen it this way, or at least seen similar acronyms spelled this way, otherwise I'd not have thought to do it this way here! Tongue

Usually, words which would not be capitalized in title-case are left out of such abbreviations completely. Sometimes they are included to make the result more "pronounceable" as a word in its own right (like "radar" instead of "RDR" for "radio detection and ranging", IIRC). When they are included the result can be all-caps or mixed-case, depending on... what the one coining it feels like, presumably?

Anyway, I'm not much concerned with getting the title just-so during the "in-progress" stage, and the permanent title won't include the tag, obviously, so there! Tongue

Quote
You could sort by award like: "Hugo", "Nebula", "Hugo/Nebula" and just put the year secondary, authors(s) tertiary.

I did consider that, but it seems to me that the year-primary approach better caters to diverse users. It works both for those who are looking specifically for, say, "1987 Nebula Award", and for those who are looking for something more nebulous like "great speculative fiction from the '80s". An award-first approach is actually less convenient for both types, because they'd have to locate the year/decade in question in two (Nebula and joint) and in all three lists, respectively.

Quote
Just know my bros and broettes, dudes and dudettes, orcs and elves, dead and undead or the rest of you....the full treasure is here!!!...and Dallis is AWESOME!

You forgot "ladies and gentlemammals"! (But the way you forgot it was awesome indeed!!) Cheesy
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: August 13, 2017, 03:05:46 AM »


Quote
Besides    "Re: [WiP]"    = 9 character spaces so you could sub WorkCopy: in the same space and be less mysterious.

Incidentally, I was curious about that too, and investigated, and no, the "Re: " prefix doesn't count as part of the character quota. If the thread title is exactly as long as it's allowed to be, the reply post titles will be four characters longer than they'd ordinarily be allowed to be, so as not to bite off the tail of the thread title. If one removes the "Re: " from the subject line of the "post reply" form, it won't allow one to put something else in its stead.
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 13, 2017, 09:23:43 AM »


Unless I can drastically cut back on the markup, the complete list isn't going to fit into a single post: I'm already past 10k characters, 20k is the limit, and I'm only about a quarter done. Ah well, splitting it up isn't the end of the world... I could even go to something like a one-decade-per-post scheme, to further aid navigation. TBD.
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2017, 08:22:37 AM »

--- backup of current contents of OP, prior to major change of layout ---

Novels (years in which both awards were won by the same work are emphasized)


--- backup of current contents of OP, prior to major change of layout ---
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2017, 09:24:09 AM »


Okay, colour-coding is in place now! Smiley

I like the result even more than I expected, mainly because of the new compactness gained from un-nesting the list structures. For the colour scheme, I started with the opposite of teal, which already dominates the page due to being the link colour, which is red, assigned that to "both awards", and then used the secondary colours either side of that, yellow and purple (actually orange and purple, for the sake of legibility) to the awards proper.

I expected to save characters as well, but the gain there is negligible, well below 10%. There are a lot fewer markup tags now, but "color=blah" is so much longer than "list" and "li" that it almost balances out. No matter, I reckon that even with no markup at all it wouldn't fit into a single post.
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 21, 2017, 01:02:57 PM »


The list now having reached a length of ~22k characters, I had to split it in two - and did split it in three, giving the legend its own. Which actually makes updating it a lot more convenient, in my "meet in the middle" approach. Tongue
Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2017, 11:43:49 AM »



7 August: Added 2017 and 1953; list ~3% complete.
8 August: Added 2016 and 1955; list ~6% complete.
8 August: Added 2015 and 1956; list ~9% complete.
9 August: Added 2014 and 1958; list ~11% complete.
9 August: Added 2013 and 1959; list ~14% complete.
11 August: Added 2012, 2011, 1961, and 1960; list ~18% complete.

11 August: Added 2010 and 1962; list ~21% complete.
12 August: Added 2009 and 1963; list ~24% complete.
12 August: Added 2008 and 1964; list ~27% complete.
13 August: Added 2007 and 1966; list ~31% complete.
14 August: Added 2006, 2005, and 1965; list ~36% complete.

15 August: Added 2004, 1967, and 1968; list ~42% complete.
20 August: Added 2003, 2002, 2000, 1999, and 1998; list ~51% complete.
21 August: Added 1975, 1974, 1972, 1970, and 1969; list ~58% complete.

23 August: Added 1994, 1978, and 1977; list ~64% complete.

Logged
kassyopeia
Eldest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 231



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2017, 03:22:24 PM »


"The Stone Sky's release was anticipated on several 'best of' upcoming science fiction and fantasy lists, including the Washington Post and io9, and reception around its release was laudatory, with reviewers from Tor and The Verge asserting that it was likely to win Jemisin a third consecutive Hugo Award for Best Novel, behind The Fifth Season and The Obelisk Gate."
 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Stone_Sky#Reception
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: